I Got Rich Off NVIDIA. This Is Even Bigger.
After years of dismissing quantum computing as decades away, Nvidia's Jensen Huang reversed course — dramatically — and the company just released software to integrate quantum processors with GPUs. In the span of two weeks, Ion Q linked two quantum chips together for the first time, Rigetti made a 100-qubit system available on AWS, and DARPA handed out federal funding to scale commercial quantum systems. The quantum computing bubble of 2024 has deflated, valuations have reset, and three breakthrough announcements just kicked off what could be the next exponential era in computing. So which of the three public quantum plays — Ion Q, Rigetti, or D-Wave — is the best bet now that the hype has cooled?
Punti chiave
Nvidia's release of the Icing software stack and NVQLink infrastructure signals that quantum computers will work alongside GPUs in hybrid data centers, not replace them — unlocking a $40 billion market by 2035.
Ion Q demonstrated the first photonic interconnect between two commercial quantum processors, solving the decades-old scaling problem and proving a path from 100 qubits to 10,000.
All three companies remain pre-profitability with small revenues and high customer concentration in government contracts, meaning 30–50% single-day swings will continue.
Rigetti is the most deeply integrated with Nvidia's stack and AWS, making it the highest-risk, highest-reward play for investors betting on Nvidia's quantum future.
D-Wave offers dual exposure to both quantum annealing and gate-based architectures, providing optionality for investors who don't want to bet on a single approach.
In breve
Quantum computing has moved from science fiction to investable reality in a matter of weeks, and Ion Q leads the pack with the strongest revenue growth, largest backlog, and the first successful multi-chip interconnect — making it the best risk-to-reward pick for investors who want exposure to the Nvidia-backed quantum era.
Jensen Huang's Quantum Pivot
Nvidia's CEO went from «15–30 years away» to quantum infrastructure in just five months.
At CES 2025 in Las Vegas, Jensen Huang told the world that useful quantum computers were 15 to 30 years away. The market reaction was instant and brutal: Ion Q dropped 39% in one day, Rigetti fell 45%, and D-Wave crashed 36%. One sentence from one CEO cratered an entire class of stocks.
Then something strange happened. Two months later at Nvidia GTC 2025, Jensen changed his tune, saying quantum was closer than he thought and hosting the first-ever Nvidia Quantum Day. Three months after that in Paris, he said quantum was reaching an inflection point and would solve real problems in the coming years. Those comments fueled a massive bubble in quantum stocks late last year.
Now the bubble is behind us. Two weeks ago, Nvidia shipped Icing, an open-source software stack that splits problems between GPUs and quantum computers, with Ion Q named as an early adopter. In ten years of investing in Nvidia, the host has never seen Jensen change his stance on any technology this fast.
Three Breakthroughs in One Week
Ion Q, Rigetti, and Nvidia delivered milestones that moved quantum from lab to market.
Nvidia ships Icing software Nvidia released an open-source AI toolkit that helps quantum chips fix their own errors in real time and speeds up calibration from days to hours.
Ion Q links two quantum chips Ion Q announced the first photonic interconnect between two separate commercial quantum processors, making them act like one — solving the decades-old scaling problem.
DARPA funds Ion Q for scale The US Department of Defense added Ion Q to the HARK program, giving them federal funding to scale quantum systems over two years.
Rigetti goes live on AWS Rigetti made the first 100-plus-qubit quantum computer generally available on Amazon Web Services, allowing anyone to rent state-of-the-art quantum compute like a regular server.
How Quantum Computers Actually Work
Market Size and Growth Trajectory
Quantum computing is projected to 20x by 2035, growing faster than most sectors.
Nvidia's Hybrid Computing Bet
Nvidia isn't building quantum chips — it's building the glue between GPUs and QPUs.
Nvidia isn't building a quantum chip. Instead, they're building the infrastructure between everyone else's quantum chips and their own GPUs. Late last year, Nvidia announced NVQLink, a super-fast connection that lets GPUs send instructions and read results in just a few millionths of a second — fast enough to watch qubits, correct errors, and adjust on the fly before decoherence kicks in.
Two weeks ago, they released Icing, an open-source AI toolkit that helps quantum chips fix their own errors in real time and speeds up calibration from days to hours. As an investor, this made one thing crystal clear: Nvidia doesn't think quantum computers will replace GPUs, or else they wouldn't build systems to support them. Instead, they see quantum plugging into current data center infrastructure for very specific workloads. The future will be hybrid computing — a mix of CPUs, GPUs, and QPUs all working together.
Three Serious Risks Before You Invest
Ion Q: The Front Runner
Trapped-ion systems, the strongest balance sheet, and the first multi-chip interconnect.
Ion Q is the closest thing to being the Nvidia of quantum computing. They use trapped-ion systems: charged atoms held in place by electromagnetic fields and controlled with lasers. This gives Ion Q some of the highest-quality qubits in the industry — slower, but with fewer errors and longer coherence times. Critically, trapped-ion systems are the easiest to network together.
Last week, Ion Q proved this by announcing the first photonic interconnect between two quantum processors. The path from 100 qubits to 10,000 is no longer science fiction. Ion Q reported $62 million in revenue last quarter, up 429% year-over-year, and $130 million for the full year — the only public quantum company to cross $100 million. Their backlog grew to $370 million, almost three times last year's revenue, and they're guiding for $235 million in 2026, implying 80% growth.
They have $3.3 billion in cash and short-term investments, a massive war chest for a company this small. But they reported an operating loss and expect larger losses in 2026 as they invest in scale. For investors, Ion Q has the biggest backlog and strongest balance sheet, but you're still betting on an unprofitable, highly volatile stock with real execution risk.
Rigetti: The Nvidia Integration Play
Superconducting systems plugged directly into Nvidia's stack and available on AWS.
If Jensen Huang is right that quantum will work with GPUs instead of replacing them, Rigetti is set up to win big. It's already plugged into Nvidia's NVQLink and CUDAQ stack for hybrid workloads, meaning any enterprise wanting Nvidia's stack plus quantum will run on Rigetti hardware. Rigetti's superconducting systems use tiny electrical circuits cooled near absolute zero, running about 4,000 times faster than Ion Q's trapped ions — but with so many more errors that they're only about 10 times faster in practice.
Rigetti is the only way to invest directly in superconducting quantum without buying IBM or Google and all their other business units. They have the first 100-plus-qubit processor available on AWS, giving millions of developers instant access. But their Q4 2025 revenue was just $1.9 million, down 18% year-over-year, and full-year revenue was $7.1 million. Rigetti is still pre-commercial.
They finished the year with about $590 million in cash and burn about $20 million per quarter, giving them roughly 7.5 years of runway. Don't mistake lack of revenue for lack of funding. For investors, Rigetti is the smallest, highest-risk, highest-reward bet on Nvidia's quantum future.
D-Wave: The Optionality Play
Paying customers today, plus two quantum architectures under one roof.
D-Wave is the only company with a commercial product that customers pay for today — not pilots, not research partnerships. Their quantum annealing systems are specialized machines built to solve optimization problems like scheduling, routing, and materials design. Companies like Volkswagen, Google, NASA, and Lockheed Martin already pay to run workloads on D-Wave systems.
In January 2025, D-Wave closed a $550 million acquisition of Quantum Circuits, Inc., giving them a gate-based quantum platform on top of their annealing business. Gate-based superconducting is more general-purpose, complementing D-Wave's specialized systems. For investors, D-Wave has two different quantum architectures under one roof — they don't have to win the war to survive it, only one needs to work out long term.
Last quarter, D-Wave's revenue was $2.8 million, up 19% year-over-year, but full-year 2025 revenue came in at $24.6 million, up 179%. In January and February 2026 alone, they reported $32.8 million in new bookings — already more than their entire 2025 revenue in just two months. They have $630 million on the balance sheet and burn around $70 million per year, giving them almost nine years of cash runway. That optionality is the unique thing about D-Wave.
The Verdict: Which Stock to Buy
Ion Q leads on fundamentals, Rigetti on Nvidia integration, D-Wave on architecture optionality.
The Verdict: Which Stock to Buy
Ion Q is the clear leader with 428% revenue growth, a $370 million backlog, and the first multi-chip interconnect. It's the best risk-to-reward pick for growth investors who want proven product-market fit. Rigetti is for those betting on Nvidia's quantum future and willing to stomach execution risk. D-Wave offers dual exposure to annealing and gate-based systems, ideal for investors who want optionality. Personally, the host wants to own all three because each has a fundamentally different approach, and he doesn't know enough to pick a single winner.
Titoli menzionati
Persone
Glossario
Avviso: Questo è un riassunto generato dall'IA di un video YouTube a scopo educativo e di riferimento. Non costituisce consulenza in materia di investimenti, finanziaria o legale. Verificare sempre le informazioni con le fonti originali prima di prendere decisioni. TubeReads non è affiliato con il creatore del contenuto.