Henry Blodget on the Software Selloff Hysteria and the Problem for OpenAI | Odd Lots
The AI bubble has gripped markets with a fever that swings between euphoria and panic, sometimes within a single trading session. A Substack piece predicting 10% unemployment by 2028 sent software stocks plummeting, while OpenAI's valuation has soared from $300 billion to $800 billion in less than a year — even as it loses money on every power user. Henry Blodget, who navigated the dotcom boom and bust, returns to dissect whether we're witnessing the next industrial revolution or the next Yahoo. Can OpenAI become the Google of this era, or will it suffer the fate of the hundreds of 1990s startups that never recovered?
Ключевые выводы
OpenAI's valuation has surged to $800 billion despite losing money on every customer, raising serious questions about whether the economics will ever close and whether it can maintain a lead as Google and others rapidly catch up.
The fear that AI will destroy software companies and jobs is likely hysteria; history shows technology transitions create new jobs even as they disrupt old ones, and enterprise buyers will not abandon trusted vendors for homemade AI solutions.
AI lacks the network effects and switching costs that defined Web 2.0 — users can jump from ChatGPT to Claude with no friction — which undermines the «Google of AI» thesis and suggests intense, sustained competition ahead.
Trusted media brands will thrive in the age of AI-generated slop because readers need editorial judgment, fact-checking, and accountability that only established newsrooms can provide, even as distribution and business models continue to shift.
The process of creating — whether research, writing, or reporting — teaches skills that consuming AI-generated summaries cannot, raising existential questions about how future generations will learn and develop expertise.
Вкратце
We are in the early, euphoric, and deeply uncertain phase of AI — much like the internet in the 1990s — where wild swings in sentiment reflect the vast range of plausible outcomes, but history suggests most bets will fail, brands with trust will win, and jobs will evolve rather than vanish.
The Valuation Problem: OpenAI's $800 Billion Question
OpenAI's soaring valuation defies brutal unit economics and rising competition.
OpenAI's valuation has climbed from $300 billion to $800 billion in less than a year, even as the company loses money on every power user and faces fiercer competition than any supposed «winner» in tech history. Blodget recalls that when Google's Gemini surpassed ChatGPT in capability, it marked a watershed moment: less than two years after ChatGPT's launch, the incumbent had already caught up. This stands in stark contrast to Amazon in the 1990s, which maintained an insurmountable lead even as it teetered on the brink of bankruptcy.
The bull case rests on projections of $100 billion in revenue within three years and the assumption that compute costs will plummet, allowing the unit economics to flip positive. But OpenAI faces a unique disadvantage: unlike Google, Facebook, or Microsoft — which generate tens of billions in free cash flow annually to fund chip purchases — OpenAI must raise capital in the open market to keep pace. If the economics don't improve soon, the company will simply run out of money, no matter how visionary its mission to build AGI.
Blodget draws a parallel to the dotcom era, when out of hundreds of companies that went public in the 1990s, only Amazon went on to make investors serious money. Cisco took 25 years to recover its peak stock price; eBay sputtered. The lesson: being early, well-funded, and hyped is no guarantee of dominance, especially when the technology lacks the network effects and switching costs that cemented Google's monopoly two decades ago.
«Nobody knows what the future is… we are effectively creating this enormous R&D lab»
Blodget compares today's AI frenzy to Edison's lab, now conducted in public.
“Nobody knows what the future is. Nobody knows what's going to work. And we are effectively creating this enormous R&D lab which is hey want you can do something. Here's some money. Go out and experiment. I hope you'll be one of the winners.”
The Software Selloff: Hysteria or Harbinger?
Why AI Lacks the Network Effects of Web 2.0
Switching costs are near zero, undermining the «OpenAI is Google» thesis.
Why AI Lacks the Network Effects of Web 2.0
Blodget highlights a critical difference between AI and the internet era: users can switch from ChatGPT to Claude instantly, with no penalty. There are no network effects, no accumulated data moat, no lock-in. Google achieved monopoly status because once users adopted it in 2000, they never looked back. OpenAI has no such advantage, and the rapid pace at which competitors have caught up suggests the market will remain fiercely contested for years.
Jobs, Disruption, and What History Teaches
Every technological revolution has created more jobs than it destroyed — so far.
Media in the Age of AI: Brands, Trust, and the End of Slop
Trusted newsrooms will thrive because AI has made misinformation easier than ever.
Blodget argues that AI is actually good news for established media brands like Bloomberg, The New York Times, and The Wall Street Journal. In an era of AI-generated slop, deepfakes, and synthetic content, readers need trusted intermediaries who can verify facts, provide context, and hold sources accountable. A million people read The New York Times at its print peak; today, billions of pieces of content circulate daily, but most are unverified and unreliable.
The industry faces a different existential challenge: there is simply too much media. Distribution has collapsed as Google and Facebook have pulled back, forcing publishers back into a direct-subscriber model that resembles the 1990s magazine era. The companies that survive will be those that serve passionate, loyal audiences with differentiated content — scoops, expertise, and editorial judgment that AI cannot replicate.
Blodget also defends his own AI newsroom experiment, in which he used ChatGPT to create five AI staffers with distinct personalities and headshots. The backlash taught him about the deep anxiety younger workers feel about job security. But he remains optimistic: media has always been about knowing what's happening and what it means, and humans will continue to want that — especially when they trust the source.
Key Numbers from the AI Economy
Tracking the metrics and milestones shaping the AI landscape.
The Process Problem: What Happens When AI Does the Thinking?
Blodget worries that outsourcing creation to AI may prevent learning and skill-building.
The Process Problem: What Happens When AI Does the Thinking?
Blodget confesses to writing a novel the old-fashioned way, even though Claude could have generated 325 pages in 20 minutes. His reason: the process of writing taught him things that reading an AI draft never could. This dilemma extends to research, journalism, and analysis. When it took a month for a young analyst to write a report, they learned deeply. If AI writes it in six minutes, what gets lost? The question is not just about jobs, but about how humans develop expertise in a world where creation is increasingly automated.
Упомянутые ценные бумаги
Люди
Глоссарий
Отказ от ответственности: Это ИИ-сводка видео с YouTube, подготовленная в образовательных и справочных целях. Она не является инвестиционной, финансовой или юридической консультацией. Всегда проверяйте информацию по первоисточникам перед принятием решений. TubeReads не связан с автором контента.